Eternal Security – An Introduction

Recently I made a new friend in a Christian forum who goes by the name of Zerich. Zerich has been trying to convince his friend that Eternal Security (aka Once Saved; Always Saved) is a doctrine that is faithful to scripture. To help Zerich out I am reproducing part of the Introduction to Lloyd A. Olson’s book “Eternal Security: Once Saved Always Saved.” Dr. Olson doesn’t have much use for those who say that a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ can lose their salvation so his language is strong. I wouldn’t recommend that Zerich show this excerpt to his friend but he may find this enlightening for his own study.

Here is Dr. Olson:

INTRODUCTION

This is an apologetic refutation of the abuses perpetrated upon God’s Word by Modern Day Sadducees (MDS). These heretics demonstrate an alarming confusion of the requirements of justification with the requirements of sanctification.

Those against OSAS make many serious mistakes. Perhaps the worst of their mistakes is the confusion of the requirement of justification with the requirements of sanctification. One cannot properly understand the totality of scripture unless one can understand this parallelism. Keep referring to the following picture. It will help you understand the two different theological systems before you throughout this book.

Santification-Justification

[NOTE: This figure is important but this is as large as I can make it. If you would like a closer view I recommend following the link above which will take you to the description of Dr. Olson’s book on Amazon. You can then “Look Inside” and get a good view of the diagram.]

Note that salvation is the broad overarching term used for Once Saved; Always Saved (OSAS) view. Salvation refers to the total package. Sometimes, the word salvation is lazily used without reference to either the forensic or filial nature being addressed. It is also lazily used without reference to the temporal (past/present/future) aspect thus creating even more confusion. Correct biblical analysis must use both dimensions. Utilization of both dimensions results in four possible concepts: Initial Justification, Initial Sanctification, Repetitive Justification, and Repetitive Sanctification. The NOSAS heresy is based on the confusion of these four concepts.

Thus, a correct understanding of terminology is a critical feature of the confusion amongst denominations. Discussions must be able to keep the following dimensions straight: justification/sanctification, past/present/future, forgiveness of sin/forgiveness of sins, destiny/rewards, faith/faithfulness and grace/works. My defense of OSAS invariably highlights saying what you mean and meaning what you say. Terminology is of critical importance!

Originally this was to contain all of the original passages typically used by both sides of this important controversy. I started with Shank’s text from the 1960s. His work used many errors of modern day Sadducees. Then, I was shown Dan Corner’s Internet site. I made a list of verses that typically are used to support the NOSAS view and started answering their claims in light of proper biblical exegesis and context.

It quickly became apparent that the list of verses used by the NOSAS crowd had the same few patterns of scriptural abuse in virtually every mishandling of scripture.  Worse, their “proofs” in any given section all seem to regurgitate versions of the same few twisted lies. They hold rightly to these “proof passages” in complete disdain of the great weight of scripture that affirms eternal security: Once Saved; Always Saved.

I’ve written this book to be used as a handy look up reference on confusing Bible verses. Each chapter is written so that you can skim the entire book in 10-15 minutes simply by reading each chapter’s Précis. Then, if you want to see more, each chapter has a Short Discussion that provides the key points from each view. Finally, each chapter has a Theological Tidbit that demonstrates a deeper aspect of biblical unity that affirms Free Grace and OSAS.

It is my deepest hope that the Lord will use this book to strengthen the knowledge of your secure position in Jesus Christ so that His mighty grace will flow through you and into a lost and dying world—all for God’s glory!

Eternal Security: Once Saved Always Saved
pp 9-10

Advertisements
Explore posts in the same categories: Eternal Security

5 Comments on “Eternal Security – An Introduction”


  1. My favorite description is:

    Once saved, perfectly saved. It is based on the perfect tense of the word saved in Ephesians 2:5,8. I hope your exchanges with Zerich bears fruit.

  2. Glenn Says:

    Hi Alex,

    Thank you for stopping by. Kevin at On My Walk has discussed the Ephesians 2:8 in one of his recent posts (see The Debater’s Potter – Part 18 – Chapter 12B) and I like his preferred translation:

    “for by grace you are saved through faith, and [you are saved] especially not by your own doing; it is the gift of God.”

    I hope Zerich finds this post useful. I am going to follow-up with another post or two on the topic.

    Glenn

  3. jeff Says:

    It is Satan’s objective to make those who are saved not feel assured and those who are unsaved to feel assured. The only problem I see with OSAS is when WE decide who is in and grant assurance to someone who we really have no concept of where they are at. It is a true doctrine, but can be used in destructive ways when applied unbiblically.

    • Glenn Says:

      Hi Jeff,

      I have come to the conclusion that we Christians can misuse just about every doctrine taught in scripture. Maybe I am being a bit too negative here but my experience tends to push me in that direction. We should all be Bereans towards our own doctrines as well as everyone else’s.

      Thank you for stopping by and commenting.

      Glenn

      • jeff Says:

        I will take your negativism a step further and say that any group of people can ruin any good thing. Christians have no monopoly on stupid! But it seems we should be non-practicing idiots more than we are. One would think the mind of Christ would lead to such results. Makes ya wonder.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: